Skip to main content

Ashtonfield vs Wyong

Property investment comparison - Ashtonfield, NSW 2323 vs Wyong, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ashtonfield wins 1, Wyong wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAshtonfieldWyong
Median house price$905K$905K
Median unit price-$565K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.53%4.90%
1-year house growth+6.3%+8.1%
3-year house growth+24.6%+8.6%
Vacancy rate2.5%0.9%
Population4,5894,530

Ashtonfield vs Wyong: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $905K in Ashtonfield and $905K in Wyong.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.3% in Ashtonfield and +8.1% in Wyong, so recent momentum favours Wyong, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Ashtonfield houses are +24.6% and Wyong houses +8.6%, so Ashtonfield has compounded faster than Wyong over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Wyong and 2.5% in Ashtonfield, so landlords in Wyong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ashtonfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,589 against 4,530, larger than Wyong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wyong for recent price momentum, Wyong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison