Skip to main content

Ashwood vs Rosanna

Property investment comparison - Ashwood, VIC 3147 vs Rosanna, VIC 3084

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ashwood wins 2, Rosanna wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAshwoodRosanna
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$1.0M$815K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.40%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.98%
1-year house growth-6.2%-2.8%
3-year house growth-1.4%+11.7%
Vacancy rate0.6%1.6%
Population7,1548,616

Ashwood vs Rosanna: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Ashwood and $1.4M in Rosanna, so Ashwood is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Ashwood sits at a median of $1.0M against $815K in Rosanna, which makes Rosanna the more affordable unit market and Ashwood the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -6.2% in Ashwood and -2.8% in Rosanna, so recent momentum favours Rosanna, while Ashwood went backwards.

Looking back three years, Ashwood houses are -1.4% and Rosanna houses +11.7%, so Rosanna has compounded faster than Ashwood over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Ashwood and 1.6% in Rosanna, so landlords in Ashwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rosanna is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,616 against 7,154, larger than Ashwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ashwood for a lower purchase price, Rosanna for recent price momentum, Ashwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison