Skip to main content

Aspendale vs Illowa

Property investment comparison - Aspendale, VIC 3195 vs Illowa, VIC 3282

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aspendale wins 2, Illowa wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAspendaleIllowa
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$865K$535K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%1.51%
Gross rental yield (units)4.14%1.71%
1-year house growth+5.2%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%0.7%
Population7,285304

Aspendale vs Illowa: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Aspendale and $1.4M in Illowa, so Illowa is the cheaper entry point, with Aspendale houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Aspendale sits at a median of $865K against $535K in Illowa, which makes Illowa the more affordable unit market and Aspendale the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aspendale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.00%, compared with 1.51% in Illowa, a gap of 1.49 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Illowa and 1.0% in Aspendale, so landlords in Illowa face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aspendale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,285 against 304, roughly 24 times the size of Illowa; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aspendale for rental income, Illowa for a lower purchase price, Illowa for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison