Skip to main content

Asquith vs Bulli

Property investment comparison - Asquith, NSW 2077 vs Bulli, NSW 2516

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Asquith wins 3, Bulli wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAsquithBulli
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$715K$875K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.48%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.15%4.40%
1-year house growth-5.2%estimate+7.5%
3-year house growth-+12.0%
Vacancy rate1.4%0.9%
Population6,1606,798

Asquith vs Bulli: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Asquith and $1.8M in Bulli, so Asquith is the cheaper entry point, with Bulli houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Asquith sits at a median of $715K against $875K in Bulli, which makes Asquith the more affordable unit market and Bulli the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -5.2% in Asquith (an estimate) and +7.5% in Bulli, so recent momentum favours Bulli, while Asquith went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Bulli and 1.4% in Asquith, so landlords in Bulli face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bulli is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,798 against 6,160, larger than Asquith; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Asquith for a lower purchase price, Bulli for recent price momentum, Bulli for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison