Skip to main content

Asquith vs Peakhurst Heights

Property investment comparison - Asquith, NSW 2077 vs Peakhurst Heights, NSW 2210

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Asquith wins 2, Peakhurst Heights wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAsquithPeakhurst Heights
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$715K$745K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.48%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.15%5.34%
1-year house growth-5.2%estimate+2.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.4%0.9%
Population6,1602,524

Asquith vs Peakhurst Heights: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Asquith and $1.8M in Peakhurst Heights, so Asquith is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Asquith sits at a median of $715K against $745K in Peakhurst Heights, which makes Asquith the more affordable unit market and Peakhurst Heights the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -5.2% in Asquith (an estimate) and +2.4% in Peakhurst Heights (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Peakhurst Heights, while Asquith went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Peakhurst Heights and 1.4% in Asquith, so landlords in Peakhurst Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Asquith is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,160 against 2,524, roughly 2.4 times the size of Peakhurst Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Asquith for a lower purchase price, Peakhurst Heights for recent price momentum, Peakhurst Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison