Athelstone vs Biggs Flat
Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Biggs Flat, SA 5153
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 1, Biggs Flat wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Athelstone | Biggs Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | - |
| Median unit price | $630K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +14.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +41.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 2.8% |
| Population | 9,601 | 84 |
Athelstone vs Biggs Flat: what the numbers say
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Athelstone and 2.8% in Biggs Flat, so landlords in Athelstone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 84, roughly 114 times the size of Biggs Flat; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Athelstone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison