Skip to main content

Athelstone vs Camden Park

Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Camden Park, SA 5038

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 2, Camden Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAthelstoneCamden Park
Median house price$1.1M-
Median unit price$630K$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.60%
1-year house growth+14.1%+9.8%
3-year house growth+41.1%+42.1%
Vacancy rate0.5%0.9%
Population9,6013,338

Athelstone vs Camden Park: what the numbers say

For units, Athelstone sits at a median of $630K against $625K in Camden Park, which makes Camden Park the more affordable unit market and Athelstone the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Athelstone and +9.8% in Camden Park, so recent momentum favours Athelstone, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Athelstone houses are +41.1% and Camden Park houses +42.1%, so Camden Park has compounded faster than Athelstone over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Athelstone and 0.9% in Camden Park, so landlords in Athelstone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 3,338, roughly 2.9 times the size of Camden Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Athelstone for recent price momentum, Athelstone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison