Skip to main content

Athelstone vs Globe Derby Park

Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Globe Derby Park, SA 5110

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 3, Globe Derby Park wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAthelstoneGlobe Derby Park
Median house price$1.1M-
Median unit price$630K$730K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%2.91%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.43%
1-year house growth+14.1%-
3-year house growth+41.1%-
Vacancy rate0.5%0.8%
Population9,601360

Athelstone vs Globe Derby Park: what the numbers say

For units, Athelstone sits at a median of $630K against $730K in Globe Derby Park, which makes Athelstone the more affordable unit market and Globe Derby Park the pricier one.

On cash flow, Athelstone leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.30%, compared with 2.91% in Globe Derby Park, a gap of 0.39 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Athelstone and 0.8% in Globe Derby Park, so landlords in Athelstone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 360, roughly 27 times the size of Globe Derby Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Athelstone for rental income, Athelstone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison