Skip to main content

Athelstone vs Klemzig

Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Klemzig, SA 5087

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 4, Klemzig wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAthelstoneKlemzig
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$630K$530K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+14.1%+13.0%
3-year house growth+41.1%+40.0%
Vacancy rate0.5%0.7%
Population9,6016,713

Athelstone vs Klemzig: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Athelstone and $1.1M in Klemzig, so Athelstone is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Athelstone sits at a median of $630K against $530K in Klemzig, which makes Klemzig the more affordable unit market and Athelstone the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Athelstone and +13.0% in Klemzig, so recent momentum favours Athelstone, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Athelstone houses are +41.1% and Klemzig houses +40.0%, so Athelstone has compounded faster than Klemzig over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Athelstone and 0.7% in Klemzig, so landlords in Athelstone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 6,713, larger than Klemzig; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Athelstone for a lower purchase price, Athelstone for recent price momentum, Athelstone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison