Athelstone vs Noarlunga Centre
Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Noarlunga Centre, SA 5168
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 2, Noarlunga Centre wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Athelstone | Noarlunga Centre |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | - |
| Median unit price | $630K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | 2.76% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.47% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +41.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 1.0% |
| Population | 9,601 | 203 |
Athelstone vs Noarlunga Centre: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Athelstone leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.30%, compared with 2.76% in Noarlunga Centre, a gap of 0.54 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Athelstone and 1.0% in Noarlunga Centre, so landlords in Athelstone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 203, roughly 47 times the size of Noarlunga Centre; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Athelstone for rental income, Athelstone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Noarlunga Centre, SA 5168
Open Noarlunga Centre suburb profileRecent sales in Noarlunga Centre
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison