Athelstone vs Ovingham
Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Ovingham, SA 5082
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 0, Ovingham wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Athelstone | Ovingham |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | - |
| Median unit price | $630K | $630K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | 4.02% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.17% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +41.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Population | 9,601 | 766 |
Athelstone vs Ovingham: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Ovingham leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.02%, compared with 3.30% in Athelstone, a gap of 0.72 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.5%.
Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 766, roughly 13 times the size of Ovingham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ovingham for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison