Athelstone vs Peterhead
Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Peterhead, SA 5016
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 3, Peterhead wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Athelstone | Peterhead |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | - |
| Median unit price | $630K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 1.97% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.1% | +11.8% |
| 3-year house growth | +41.1% | +36.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 0.9% |
| Population | 9,601 | 1,201 |
Athelstone vs Peterhead: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Athelstone and +11.8% in Peterhead, so recent momentum favours Athelstone, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Athelstone houses are +41.1% and Peterhead houses +36.0%, so Athelstone has compounded faster than Peterhead over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Athelstone and 0.9% in Peterhead, so landlords in Athelstone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 1,201, roughly 8 times the size of Peterhead; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Athelstone for recent price momentum, Athelstone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison