Skip to main content

Athelstone vs Pooraka

Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Pooraka, SA 5095

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 1, Pooraka wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAthelstonePooraka
Median house price$1.1M-
Median unit price$630K$610K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.41%
1-year house growth+14.1%+14.0%
3-year house growth+41.1%+51.1%
Vacancy rate0.5%0.4%
Population9,6017,583

Athelstone vs Pooraka: what the numbers say

For units, Athelstone sits at a median of $630K against $610K in Pooraka, which makes Pooraka the more affordable unit market and Athelstone the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Athelstone and +14.0% in Pooraka, so recent momentum favours Athelstone, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Athelstone houses are +41.1% and Pooraka houses +51.1%, so Pooraka has compounded faster than Athelstone over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Pooraka and 0.5% in Athelstone, so landlords in Pooraka face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 7,583, larger than Pooraka; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Athelstone for recent price momentum, Pooraka for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison