Skip to main content

Athelstone vs Rostrevor

Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Rostrevor, SA 5073

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 3, Rostrevor wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAthelstoneRostrevor
Median house price$1.1M-
Median unit price$630K$690K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.05%
1-year house growth+14.1%+16.7%
3-year house growth+41.1%+40.6%
Vacancy rate0.5%1.6%
Population9,6018,452

Athelstone vs Rostrevor: what the numbers say

For units, Athelstone sits at a median of $630K against $690K in Rostrevor, which makes Athelstone the more affordable unit market and Rostrevor the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Athelstone and +16.7% in Rostrevor, so recent momentum favours Rostrevor, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Athelstone houses are +41.1% and Rostrevor houses +40.6%, so Athelstone has compounded faster than Rostrevor over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Athelstone and 1.6% in Rostrevor, so landlords in Athelstone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 8,452, larger than Rostrevor; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rostrevor for recent price momentum, Athelstone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Athelstone vs Rostrevor: Suburb Comparison 2026