Athelstone vs Salisbury Heights
Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Salisbury Heights, SA 5109
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 2, Salisbury Heights wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Athelstone | Salisbury Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | - |
| Median unit price | $630K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.46% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.1% | +9.2% |
| 3-year house growth | +41.1% | +53.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Population | 9,601 | 4,488 |
Athelstone vs Salisbury Heights: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Athelstone and +9.2% in Salisbury Heights, so recent momentum favours Athelstone, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Athelstone houses are +41.1% and Salisbury Heights houses +53.2%, so Salisbury Heights has compounded faster than Athelstone over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.5%.
Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 4,488, roughly 2.1 times the size of Salisbury Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Athelstone for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Salisbury Heights, SA 5109
Open Salisbury Heights suburb profileRecent sales in Salisbury Heights
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison