Athelstone vs Teringie
Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Teringie, SA 5072
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 2, Teringie wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Athelstone | Teringie |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | - |
| Median unit price | $630K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | 2.85% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.97% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +41.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Population | 9,601 | 831 |
Athelstone vs Teringie: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Athelstone leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.30%, compared with 2.85% in Teringie, a gap of 0.45 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.5%.
Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 831, roughly 12 times the size of Teringie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Athelstone for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison