Skip to main content

Athelstone vs Torrensville

Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Torrensville, SA 5031

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 2, Torrensville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAthelstoneTorrensville
Median house price$1.1M-
Median unit price$630K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%3.00%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.09%
1-year house growth+14.1%+9.5%estimate
3-year house growth+41.1%-
Vacancy rate0.5%0.1%
Population9,6014,110

Athelstone vs Torrensville: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Athelstone leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.30%, compared with 3.00% in Torrensville, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Athelstone and +9.5% in Torrensville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Athelstone, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Torrensville and 0.5% in Athelstone, so landlords in Torrensville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 4,110, roughly 2.3 times the size of Torrensville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Athelstone for rental income, Athelstone for recent price momentum, Torrensville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison