Athelstone vs Wistow
Property investment comparison - Athelstone, SA 5076 vs Wistow, SA 5251
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Athelstone wins 2, Wistow wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Athelstone | Wistow |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | - |
| Median unit price | $630K | $635K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.15% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +41.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 0.8% |
| Population | 9,601 | 285 |
Athelstone vs Wistow: what the numbers say
For units, Athelstone sits at a median of $630K against $635K in Wistow, which makes Athelstone the more affordable unit market and Wistow the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Athelstone and 0.8% in Wistow, so landlords in Athelstone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Athelstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,601 against 285, roughly 34 times the size of Wistow; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Athelstone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison