Skip to main content

Attwood vs Creswick North

Property investment comparison - Attwood, VIC 3049 vs Creswick North, VIC 3363

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Attwood wins 3, Creswick North wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAttwoodCreswick North
Median house price$900K$905K
Median unit price$225K$255K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.18%2.77%
Gross rental yield (units)4.24%7.41%
1-year house growth+16.1%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.9%0.7%
Population3,30955

Attwood vs Creswick North: what the numbers say

The median house price is $900K in Attwood and $905K in Creswick North, so Attwood is the cheaper entry point, with Creswick North houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Attwood sits at a median of $225K against $255K in Creswick North, which makes Attwood the more affordable unit market and Creswick North the pricier one.

On cash flow, Attwood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.18%, compared with 2.77% in Creswick North, a gap of 0.41 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Creswick North and 1.9% in Attwood, so landlords in Creswick North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Attwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,309 against 55, roughly 60 times the size of Creswick North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Attwood for rental income, Attwood for a lower purchase price, Creswick North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison