Skip to main content

Attwood vs Highton

Property investment comparison - Attwood, VIC 3049 vs Highton, VIC 3216

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Attwood wins 3, Highton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAttwoodHighton
Median house price$900K$900K
Median unit price$225K$535K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.18%3.50%
Gross rental yield (units)4.24%4.45%
1-year house growth+16.1%estimate+2.3%
3-year house growth--2.6%
Vacancy rate1.9%2.1%
Population3,30920,736

Attwood vs Highton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $900K in Attwood and $900K in Highton.

For units, Attwood sits at a median of $225K against $535K in Highton, which makes Attwood the more affordable unit market and Highton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Highton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.50%, compared with 3.18% in Attwood, a gap of 0.32 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.1% in Attwood (an estimate) and +2.3% in Highton, so recent momentum favours Attwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Attwood and 2.1% in Highton, so landlords in Attwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Highton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 20,736 against 3,309, roughly 6 times the size of Attwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Highton for rental income, Attwood for recent price momentum, Attwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison