Skip to main content

Attwood vs Lake Eildon

Property investment comparison - Attwood, VIC 3049 vs Lake Eildon, VIC 3713

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Attwood wins 2, Lake Eildon wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAttwoodLake Eildon
Median house price$900K$900K
Median unit price$225K$325K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.18%2.47%
Gross rental yield (units)4.24%4.58%
1-year house growth+16.1%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.9%1.1%
Population3,3093

Attwood vs Lake Eildon: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $900K in Attwood and $900K in Lake Eildon.

For units, Attwood sits at a median of $225K against $325K in Lake Eildon, which makes Attwood the more affordable unit market and Lake Eildon the pricier one.

On cash flow, Attwood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.18%, compared with 2.47% in Lake Eildon, a gap of 0.71 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Lake Eildon and 1.9% in Attwood, so landlords in Lake Eildon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Attwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,309 against 3, roughly 1103 times the size of Lake Eildon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Attwood for rental income, Lake Eildon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison