Attwood vs Loch
Property investment comparison - Attwood, VIC 3049 vs Loch, VIC 3945
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Attwood wins 4, Loch wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Attwood | Loch |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $900K | $905K |
| Median unit price | $225K | $395K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.18% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.24% | 2.74% |
| 1-year house growth | +16.1%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 8.7% |
| Population | 3,309 | 707 |
Attwood vs Loch: what the numbers say
The median house price is $900K in Attwood and $905K in Loch, so Attwood is the cheaper entry point, with Loch houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Attwood sits at a median of $225K against $395K in Loch, which makes Attwood the more affordable unit market and Loch the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Attwood and 8.7% in Loch, so landlords in Attwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Attwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,309 against 707, roughly 4.7 times the size of Loch; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Attwood for a lower purchase price, Attwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison