Attwood vs Mount Evelyn
Property investment comparison - Attwood, VIC 3049 vs Mount Evelyn, VIC 3796
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Attwood wins 1, Mount Evelyn wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Attwood | Mount Evelyn |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $900K | $900K |
| Median unit price | $225K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.18% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.24% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +16.1%estimate | +5.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +7.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 0.9% |
| Population | 3,309 | 9,799 |
Attwood vs Mount Evelyn: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $900K in Attwood and $900K in Mount Evelyn.
Over the past year house prices moved +16.1% in Attwood (an estimate) and +5.1% in Mount Evelyn, so recent momentum favours Attwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Mount Evelyn and 1.9% in Attwood, so landlords in Mount Evelyn face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Mount Evelyn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,799 against 3,309, roughly 3.0 times the size of Attwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Attwood for recent price momentum, Mount Evelyn for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison