Attwood vs Tarnook
Property investment comparison - Attwood, VIC 3049 vs Tarnook, VIC 3670
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Attwood wins 3, Tarnook wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Attwood | Tarnook |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $900K | $905K |
| Median unit price | $225K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.18% | 2.17% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.24% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +16.1%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 3.5% |
| Population | 3,309 | 103 |
Attwood vs Tarnook: what the numbers say
The median house price is $900K in Attwood and $905K in Tarnook, so Attwood is the cheaper entry point, with Tarnook houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Attwood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.18%, compared with 2.17% in Tarnook, a gap of 1.01 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Attwood and 3.5% in Tarnook, so landlords in Attwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Attwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,309 against 103, roughly 32 times the size of Tarnook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Attwood for rental income, Attwood for a lower purchase price, Attwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison