Skip to main content

Austinmer vs Marrickville

Property investment comparison - Austinmer, NSW 2515 vs Marrickville, NSW 2204

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Austinmer wins 3, Marrickville wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAustinmerMarrickville
Median house price$2.1M$2.2M
Median unit price-$980K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.53%
Gross rental yield (units)3.23%-
1-year house growth+6.5%estimate-1.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.5%1.2%
Population2,72526,570

Austinmer vs Marrickville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Austinmer and $2.2M in Marrickville, so Austinmer is the cheaper entry point, with Marrickville houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.5% in Austinmer (an estimate) and -1.5% in Marrickville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Austinmer, while Marrickville went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Austinmer and 1.2% in Marrickville, so landlords in Austinmer face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Marrickville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 26,570 against 2,725, roughly 10 times the size of Austinmer; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Austinmer for a lower purchase price, Austinmer for recent price momentum, Austinmer for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison