Austins Ferry vs Jetsonville
Property investment comparison - Austins Ferry, TAS 7011 vs Jetsonville, TAS 7260
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Austins Ferry wins 1, Jetsonville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Austins Ferry | Jetsonville |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $735K | $735K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.70% | 3.22% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.08% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | - |
| 3-year house growth | +14.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 4.3% | 1.2% |
| Population | 2,395 | 147 |
Austins Ferry vs Jetsonville: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $735K in Austins Ferry and $735K in Jetsonville.
On cash flow, Austins Ferry leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.70%, compared with 3.22% in Jetsonville, a gap of 1.48 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Jetsonville and 4.3% in Austins Ferry, so landlords in Jetsonville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Austins Ferry is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,395 against 147, roughly 16 times the size of Jetsonville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Austins Ferry for rental income, Jetsonville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison