Austins Ferry vs Sorell
Property investment comparison - Austins Ferry, TAS 7011 vs Sorell, TAS 7172
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Austins Ferry wins 2, Sorell wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Austins Ferry | Sorell |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $735K | $730K |
| Median unit price | - | $570K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.70% | 4.49% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.08% | 4.71% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +14.8%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +14.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 4.3% | 1.8% |
| Population | 2,395 | 3,597 |
Austins Ferry vs Sorell: what the numbers say
The median house price is $735K in Austins Ferry and $730K in Sorell, so Sorell is the cheaper entry point, with Austins Ferry houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Austins Ferry leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.70%, compared with 4.49% in Sorell, a gap of 0.21 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Sorell and 4.3% in Austins Ferry, so landlords in Sorell face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Sorell is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,597 against 2,395, larger than Austins Ferry; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Austins Ferry for rental income, Sorell for a lower purchase price, Sorell for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison