Skip to main content

Austins Ferry vs Turners Beach

Property investment comparison - Austins Ferry, TAS 7011 vs Turners Beach, TAS 7315

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Austins Ferry wins 3, Turners Beach wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAustins FerryTurners Beach
Median house price$735K$740K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.70%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.08%4.86%
1-year house growth-+14.7%
3-year house growth+14.2%+12.2%
Vacancy rate4.3%0.5%
Population2,3951,966

Austins Ferry vs Turners Beach: what the numbers say

The median house price is $735K in Austins Ferry and $740K in Turners Beach, so Austins Ferry is the cheaper entry point, with Turners Beach houses about 1% dearer.

Looking back three years, Austins Ferry houses are +14.2% and Turners Beach houses +12.2%, so Austins Ferry has compounded faster than Turners Beach over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Turners Beach and 4.3% in Austins Ferry, so landlords in Turners Beach face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Austins Ferry is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,395 against 1,966, larger than Turners Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Austins Ferry for a lower purchase price, Turners Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison