Austral vs Emu Heights
Property investment comparison - Austral, NSW 2179 vs Emu Heights, NSW 2750
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Austral wins 0, Emu Heights wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Austral | Emu Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.22% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.62% | 2.94% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.5%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +32.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 4.5% | 0.4% |
| Population | 6,847 | 3,205 |
Austral vs Emu Heights: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Austral and $1.2M in Emu Heights.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Emu Heights and 4.5% in Austral, so landlords in Emu Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Austral is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,847 against 3,205, roughly 2.1 times the size of Emu Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Emu Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison