Austral vs Hoxton Park
Property investment comparison - Austral, NSW 2179 vs Hoxton Park, NSW 2171
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Austral wins 0, Hoxton Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Austral | Hoxton Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.99% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.62% | 4.19% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +32.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 4.5% | 2.2% |
| Population | 6,847 | 4,572 |
Austral vs Hoxton Park: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Austral and $1.2M in Hoxton Park.
Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Hoxton Park and 4.5% in Austral, so landlords in Hoxton Park face less competition for tenants.
Austral is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,847 against 4,572, larger than Hoxton Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hoxton Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison