Skip to main content

Australind vs Seville Grove

Property investment comparison - Australind, WA 6233 vs Seville Grove, WA 6112

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Australind wins 1, Seville Grove wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAustralindSeville Grove
Median house price$785K$780K
Median unit price$620K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.50%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+18.0%+16.2%estimate
3-year house growth+63.4%-
Vacancy rate2.0%1.1%
Population15,98811,408

Australind vs Seville Grove: what the numbers say

The median house price is $785K in Australind and $780K in Seville Grove, so Seville Grove is the cheaper entry point, with Australind houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Seville Grove leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.50%, compared with 4.40% in Australind, a gap of 0.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.0% in Australind and +16.2% in Seville Grove (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Australind, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Seville Grove and 2.0% in Australind, so landlords in Seville Grove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Australind is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,988 against 11,408, larger than Seville Grove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Seville Grove for rental income, Seville Grove for a lower purchase price, Australind for recent price momentum, Seville Grove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison