Australind vs Tom Price
Property investment comparison - Australind, WA 6233 vs Tom Price, WA 6751
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Australind wins 1, Tom Price wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Australind | Tom Price |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $785K | $780K |
| Median unit price | $620K | $925K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.40% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +18.0% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +63.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 1.1% |
| Population | 15,988 | 2,910 |
Australind vs Tom Price: what the numbers say
The median house price is $785K in Australind and $780K in Tom Price, so Tom Price is the cheaper entry point, with Australind houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Australind sits at a median of $620K against $925K in Tom Price, which makes Australind the more affordable unit market and Tom Price the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Tom Price and 2.0% in Australind, so landlords in Tom Price face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Australind is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,988 against 2,910, roughly 5 times the size of Tom Price; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tom Price for a lower purchase price, Tom Price for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison