Skip to main content

Avoca vs Julago

Property investment comparison - Avoca, QLD 4670 vs Julago, QLD 4816

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Avoca wins 4, Julago wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAvocaJulago
Median house price$730K$730K
Median unit price-$465K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.50%4.35%
Gross rental yield (units)4.06%2.70%
1-year house growth+16.6%+16.4%
3-year house growth+56.1%+60.3%
Vacancy rate1.1%2.1%
Population4,912384

Avoca vs Julago: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Avoca and $730K in Julago.

On cash flow, Avoca leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.50%, compared with 4.35% in Julago, a gap of 0.15 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.6% in Avoca and +16.4% in Julago, so recent momentum favours Avoca, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Avoca houses are +56.1% and Julago houses +60.3%, so Julago has compounded faster than Avoca over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Avoca and 2.1% in Julago, so landlords in Avoca face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Avoca is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,912 against 384, roughly 13 times the size of Julago; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Avoca for rental income, Avoca for recent price momentum, Avoca for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison