Skip to main content

Avoca vs One Mile

Property investment comparison - Avoca, QLD 4670 vs One Mile, QLD 4305

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Avoca wins 1, One Mile wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAvocaOne Mile
Median house price$730K$730K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.50%3.71%
Gross rental yield (units)4.06%4.13%
1-year house growth+16.6%+17.8%
3-year house growth+56.1%+67.3%
Vacancy rate1.1%0.3%
Population4,9122,038

Avoca vs One Mile: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Avoca and $730K in One Mile.

On cash flow, Avoca leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.50%, compared with 3.71% in One Mile, a gap of 0.79 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.6% in Avoca and +17.8% in One Mile, so recent momentum favours One Mile, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Avoca houses are +56.1% and One Mile houses +67.3%, so One Mile has compounded faster than Avoca over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in One Mile and 1.1% in Avoca, so landlords in One Mile face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Avoca is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,912 against 2,038, roughly 2.4 times the size of One Mile; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Avoca for rental income, One Mile for recent price momentum, One Mile for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison