Skip to main content

Avoca vs Highlands

Property investment comparison - Avoca, VIC 3467 vs Highlands, VIC 3660

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Avoca wins 2, Highlands wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAvocaHighlands
Median house price$400K$385K
Median unit price$320K$350K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.06%6.43%
Gross rental yield (units)2.61%5.62%
1-year house growth+6.0%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%1.1%
Population1,356151

Avoca vs Highlands: what the numbers say

The median house price is $400K in Avoca and $385K in Highlands, so Highlands is the cheaper entry point, with Avoca houses about 4% dearer.

For units, Avoca sits at a median of $320K against $350K in Highlands, which makes Avoca the more affordable unit market and Highlands the pricier one.

On cash flow, Highlands leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.43%, compared with 5.06% in Avoca, a gap of 1.37 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Avoca and 1.1% in Highlands, so landlords in Avoca face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Avoca is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,356 against 151, roughly 9 times the size of Highlands; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Highlands for rental income, Highlands for a lower purchase price, Avoca for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison