Avoca vs Pimpinio
Property investment comparison - Avoca, VIC 3467 vs Pimpinio, VIC 3401
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Avoca wins 2, Pimpinio wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Avoca | Pimpinio |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $400K | $395K |
| Median unit price | $320K | $375K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.06% | 2.41% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.61% | 3.28% |
| 1-year house growth | +6.0%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | - |
| Population | 1,356 | 191 |
Avoca vs Pimpinio: what the numbers say
The median house price is $400K in Avoca and $395K in Pimpinio, so Pimpinio is the cheaper entry point, with Avoca houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Avoca sits at a median of $320K against $375K in Pimpinio, which makes Avoca the more affordable unit market and Pimpinio the pricier one.
On cash flow, Avoca leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.06%, compared with 2.41% in Pimpinio, a gap of 2.65 percentage points.
Avoca is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,356 against 191, roughly 7 times the size of Pimpinio; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Avoca for rental income, Pimpinio for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison