Skip to main content

Avoca vs Yarram

Property investment comparison - Avoca, VIC 3467 vs Yarram, VIC 3971

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Avoca wins 2, Yarram wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAvocaYarram
Median house price$400K$415K
Median unit price$320K-
Gross rental yield (houses)5.06%4.45%
Gross rental yield (units)2.61%-
1-year house growth+6.0%estimate+7.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%0.1%
Population1,3562,136

Avoca vs Yarram: what the numbers say

The median house price is $400K in Avoca and $415K in Yarram, so Avoca is the cheaper entry point, with Yarram houses about 4% dearer.

On cash flow, Avoca leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.06%, compared with 4.45% in Yarram, a gap of 0.61 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.0% in Avoca (an estimate) and +7.7% in Yarram (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Yarram, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Yarram and 0.9% in Avoca, so landlords in Yarram face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Yarram is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,136 against 1,356, larger than Avoca; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Avoca for rental income, Avoca for a lower purchase price, Yarram for recent price momentum, Yarram for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison