Skip to main content

Bacchus Marsh vs Manor Lakes

Property investment comparison - Bacchus Marsh, VIC 3340 vs Manor Lakes, VIC 3024

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bacchus Marsh wins 4, Manor Lakes wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBacchus MarshManor Lakes
Median house price$655K$655K
Median unit price$425K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%3.76%
Gross rental yield (units)5.33%3.98%
1-year house growth+8.3%+2.6%estimate
3-year house growth+1.6%-
Vacancy rate1.6%3.4%
Population7,80812,675

Bacchus Marsh vs Manor Lakes: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $655K in Bacchus Marsh and $655K in Manor Lakes.

On cash flow, Bacchus Marsh leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.00%, compared with 3.76% in Manor Lakes, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.3% in Bacchus Marsh and +2.6% in Manor Lakes (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bacchus Marsh, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Bacchus Marsh and 3.4% in Manor Lakes, so landlords in Bacchus Marsh face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Manor Lakes is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,675 against 7,808, larger than Bacchus Marsh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bacchus Marsh for rental income, Bacchus Marsh for recent price momentum, Bacchus Marsh for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison