Bacchus Marsh vs Morgiana
Property investment comparison - Bacchus Marsh, VIC 3340 vs Morgiana, VIC 3301
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bacchus Marsh wins 2, Morgiana wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bacchus Marsh | Morgiana |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $655K | $655K |
| Median unit price | $425K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.00% | 3.64% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.33% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +8.3% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +1.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 14.5% |
| Population | 7,808 | 29 |
Bacchus Marsh vs Morgiana: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $655K in Bacchus Marsh and $655K in Morgiana.
On cash flow, Bacchus Marsh leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.00%, compared with 3.64% in Morgiana, a gap of 0.36 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Bacchus Marsh and 14.5% in Morgiana, so landlords in Bacchus Marsh face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Bacchus Marsh is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,808 against 29, roughly 269 times the size of Morgiana; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bacchus Marsh for rental income, Bacchus Marsh for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison