Skip to main content

Badagarang vs Forbes

Property investment comparison - Badagarang, NSW 2540 vs Forbes, NSW 2871

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Badagarang wins 2, Forbes wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBadagarangForbes
Median house price$455K$465K
Median unit price$620K-
Gross rental yield (houses)7.21%4.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.66%-
1-year house growth-2.6%estimate+12.0%
3-year house growth-+11.5%
Vacancy rate2.4%1.5%
Population11,8318,157

Badagarang vs Forbes: what the numbers say

The median house price is $455K in Badagarang and $465K in Forbes, so Badagarang is the cheaper entry point, with Forbes houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Badagarang leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 7.21%, compared with 4.80% in Forbes, a gap of 2.41 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -2.6% in Badagarang (an estimate) and +12.0% in Forbes, so recent momentum favours Forbes, while Badagarang went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Forbes and 2.4% in Badagarang, so landlords in Forbes face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Badagarang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,831 against 8,157, larger than Forbes; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Badagarang for rental income, Badagarang for a lower purchase price, Forbes for recent price momentum, Forbes for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison