Skip to main content

Bahrs Scrub vs Cooran

Property investment comparison - Bahrs Scrub, QLD 4207 vs Cooran, QLD 4569

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bahrs Scrub wins 4, Cooran wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBahrs ScrubCooran
Median house price$995K$995K
Median unit price$890K$700K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.70%3.57%
Gross rental yield (units)3.18%2.41%
1-year house growth+19.7%+10.0%estimate
3-year house growth+48.5%-
Vacancy rate1.0%3.3%
Population4,5081,756

Bahrs Scrub vs Cooran: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $995K in Bahrs Scrub and $995K in Cooran.

For units, Bahrs Scrub sits at a median of $890K against $700K in Cooran, which makes Cooran the more affordable unit market and Bahrs Scrub the pricier one.

On cash flow, Bahrs Scrub leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 3.57% in Cooran, a gap of 0.13 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.7% in Bahrs Scrub and +10.0% in Cooran (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bahrs Scrub, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Bahrs Scrub and 3.3% in Cooran, so landlords in Bahrs Scrub face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bahrs Scrub is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,508 against 1,756, roughly 2.6 times the size of Cooran; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bahrs Scrub for rental income, Bahrs Scrub for recent price momentum, Bahrs Scrub for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison