Skip to main content

Bairnsdale vs Keely

Property investment comparison - Bairnsdale, VIC 3875 vs Keely, VIC 3568

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bairnsdale wins 4, Keely wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBairnsdaleKeely
Median house price$515K$520K
Median unit price$360K$405K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.85%4.33%
Gross rental yield (units)5.52%6.61%
1-year house growth+16.8%-
3-year house growth+18.4%-
Vacancy rate1.6%2.7%
Population7,90557

Bairnsdale vs Keely: what the numbers say

The median house price is $515K in Bairnsdale and $520K in Keely, so Bairnsdale is the cheaper entry point, with Keely houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Bairnsdale sits at a median of $360K against $405K in Keely, which makes Bairnsdale the more affordable unit market and Keely the pricier one.

On cash flow, Bairnsdale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.85%, compared with 4.33% in Keely, a gap of 0.52 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Bairnsdale and 2.7% in Keely, so landlords in Bairnsdale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bairnsdale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,905 against 57, roughly 139 times the size of Keely; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bairnsdale for rental income, Bairnsdale for a lower purchase price, Bairnsdale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison