Balaclava vs Floraville
Property investment comparison - Balaclava, NSW 2575 vs Floraville, NSW 2280
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Balaclava wins 2, Floraville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Balaclava | Floraville |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $680K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.14% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.68% | 3.50% |
| 1-year house growth | +5.2% | +8.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +19.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Population | 574 | 1,814 |
Balaclava vs Floraville: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Balaclava and $1.2M in Floraville.
Over the past year house prices moved +5.2% in Balaclava and +8.2% in Floraville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Floraville, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Balaclava and 1.7% in Floraville, so landlords in Balaclava face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Floraville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,814 against 574, roughly 3.2 times the size of Balaclava; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Floraville for recent price momentum, Balaclava for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison