Skip to main content

Balaclava vs Yannathan

Property investment comparison - Balaclava, VIC 3183 vs Yannathan, VIC 3981

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Balaclava wins 3, Yannathan wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBalaclavaYannathan
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$550K$1.2M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.46%2.70%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+9.3%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.3%0.6%
Population5,392272

Balaclava vs Yannathan: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Balaclava and $1.5M in Yannathan, so Balaclava is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Balaclava sits at a median of $550K against $1.2M in Yannathan, which makes Balaclava the more affordable unit market and Yannathan the pricier one.

On cash flow, Balaclava leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.46%, compared with 2.70% in Yannathan, a gap of 0.76 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Yannathan and 2.3% in Balaclava, so landlords in Yannathan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Balaclava is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,392 against 272, roughly 20 times the size of Yannathan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Balaclava for rental income, Balaclava for a lower purchase price, Yannathan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison