Skip to main content

Balcatta vs Quinns Rocks

Property investment comparison - Balcatta, WA 6021 vs Quinns Rocks, WA 6030

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Balcatta wins 4, Quinns Rocks wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBalcattaQuinns Rocks
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$790K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.86%4.80%
1-year house growth+22.1%+16.2%
3-year house growth+58.5%+61.8%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.1%
Population10,8138,861

Balcatta vs Quinns Rocks: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Balcatta and $1.0M in Quinns Rocks, so Quinns Rocks is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Balcatta leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.80% in Quinns Rocks, a gap of 0.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +22.1% in Balcatta and +16.2% in Quinns Rocks, so recent momentum favours Balcatta, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Balcatta houses are +58.5% and Quinns Rocks houses +61.8%, so Quinns Rocks has compounded faster than Balcatta over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Balcatta and 1.1% in Quinns Rocks, so landlords in Balcatta face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Balcatta is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,813 against 8,861, larger than Quinns Rocks; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Balcatta for rental income, Quinns Rocks for a lower purchase price, Balcatta for recent price momentum, Balcatta for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison