Bald Hills vs Lynam
Property investment comparison - Bald Hills, QLD 4036 vs Lynam, QLD 4818
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bald Hills wins 1, Lynam wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bald Hills | Lynam |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | $780K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.42% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.96% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +16.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +53.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 0.7% |
| Population | 7,000 | 8 |
Bald Hills vs Lynam: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Bald Hills and $1.1M in Lynam, so Bald Hills is the cheaper entry point, with Lynam houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Lynam and 0.9% in Bald Hills, so landlords in Lynam face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Bald Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,000 against 8, roughly 875 times the size of Lynam; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bald Hills for a lower purchase price, Lynam for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison