Skip to main content

Bald Hills vs Ormeau Hills

Property investment comparison - Bald Hills, QLD 4036 vs Ormeau Hills, QLD 4208

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bald Hills wins 5, Ormeau Hills wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBald HillsOrmeau Hills
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$780K$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.42%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.96%1.95%
1-year house growth+16.2%+10.5%
3-year house growth+53.3%+41.9%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.6%
Population7,0004,521

Bald Hills vs Ormeau Hills: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Bald Hills and $1.1M in Ormeau Hills.

For units, Bald Hills sits at a median of $780K against $1.1M in Ormeau Hills, which makes Bald Hills the more affordable unit market and Ormeau Hills the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.2% in Bald Hills and +10.5% in Ormeau Hills, so recent momentum favours Bald Hills, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bald Hills houses are +53.3% and Ormeau Hills houses +41.9%, so Bald Hills has compounded faster than Ormeau Hills over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Bald Hills and 1.6% in Ormeau Hills, so landlords in Bald Hills face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bald Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,000 against 4,521, larger than Ormeau Hills; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bald Hills for recent price momentum, Bald Hills for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison