Skip to main content

Balgownie vs Carnes Hill

Property investment comparison - Balgownie, NSW 2519 vs Carnes Hill, NSW 2171

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Balgownie wins 4, Carnes Hill wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBalgownieCarnes Hill
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$940K$885K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.21%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.25%4.16%
1-year house growth+6.9%+0.1%
3-year house growth+17.7%+18.3%
Vacancy rate0.8%2.4%
Population5,7223,332

Balgownie vs Carnes Hill: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Balgownie and $1.4M in Carnes Hill, so Balgownie is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Balgownie sits at a median of $940K against $885K in Carnes Hill, which makes Carnes Hill the more affordable unit market and Balgownie the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.9% in Balgownie and +0.1% in Carnes Hill, so recent momentum favours Balgownie, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Balgownie houses are +17.7% and Carnes Hill houses +18.3%, so Carnes Hill has compounded faster than Balgownie over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Balgownie and 2.4% in Carnes Hill, so landlords in Balgownie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Balgownie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,722 against 3,332, larger than Carnes Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Balgownie for a lower purchase price, Balgownie for recent price momentum, Balgownie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison