Skip to main content

Balgownie vs Chester Hill

Property investment comparison - Balgownie, NSW 2519 vs Chester Hill, NSW 2162

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Balgownie wins 2, Chester Hill wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBalgownieChester Hill
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$940K$820K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.21%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.25%4.53%
1-year house growth+6.9%+8.8%
3-year house growth+17.7%+27.1%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.9%
Population5,72214,007

Balgownie vs Chester Hill: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Balgownie and $1.4M in Chester Hill, so Balgownie is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Balgownie sits at a median of $940K against $820K in Chester Hill, which makes Chester Hill the more affordable unit market and Balgownie the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.9% in Balgownie and +8.8% in Chester Hill, so recent momentum favours Chester Hill, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Balgownie houses are +17.7% and Chester Hill houses +27.1%, so Chester Hill has compounded faster than Balgownie over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.8%.

Chester Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,007 against 5,722, roughly 2.4 times the size of Balgownie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Balgownie for a lower purchase price, Chester Hill for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison