Skip to main content

Ballajura vs Pearsall

Property investment comparison - Ballajura, WA 6066 vs Pearsall, WA 6065

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ballajura wins 4, Pearsall wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBallajuraPearsall
Median house price$920K$925K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.38%4.30%
Gross rental yield (units)4.90%4.70%
1-year house growth+17.8%estimate+18.9%
3-year house growth-+76.1%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.1%
Population18,4594,244

Ballajura vs Pearsall: what the numbers say

The median house price is $920K in Ballajura and $925K in Pearsall, so Ballajura is the cheaper entry point, with Pearsall houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Ballajura leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.38%, compared with 4.30% in Pearsall, a gap of 0.08 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.8% in Ballajura (an estimate) and +18.9% in Pearsall, so recent momentum favours Pearsall, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Ballajura and 1.1% in Pearsall, so landlords in Ballajura face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ballajura is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,459 against 4,244, roughly 4.3 times the size of Pearsall; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ballajura for rental income, Ballajura for a lower purchase price, Pearsall for recent price momentum, Ballajura for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison